This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Warwick, P. V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Proximity, Directionality, and the Riddle of Relative Party Extremeness

Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, warwick{at}sfu.ca

Using survey data on European countries, this paper examines the degree of correspondence in left-right policy positions between political parties and the citizens who vote for them through the prism of two competing views on what the ideal correspondence should be. The views are proximity theory, which holds that voters prefer parties to be as close as possible in policy terms, and Rabinowitz-Macdonald (RM) directionality theory, which asserts that voters prefer parties to take positions with greater emotional intensity than the voters themselves feel. It is shown that while the correspondence between party and voter is strong, parties tend to adopt positions that are relatively more extreme than those held by their voters and that the voters, perceptual distortions notwithstanding, are aware of it. This is usually taken as evidence for RM directionality but it is demonstrated that this theory does not and, in fact, cannot explain the discrepancy between what voters want and what parties deliver.

Key Words: directionality • political parties • proximity • relative extremism • voting

Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 16, No. 3, 263-287 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0951629804043203


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?